10-12-20:
In quest'anno dovremmo essere riusciti ad abbattere un bel pò d'inquinamento perché, come dico sempre, dove non poté Greta poté Corona.
Ma disastri di ogni sorta non sono mancati, alcuni dei quali naturali (o quanto meno, non innescati direttamente dall'uomo), come le recenti alluvioni in: Calabria, Sardegna ed Emilia. Bella roba, per un tardo autunno, eh?
Ma i fenomeni estremi sono sempre più da aspettarsi: al TGR Leonardo l'altro giorno, dicevano che la temperatura di novembre è stata la più alta mai registrata come media globale. E che negli ultimi 50 anni è come se una lampadina da 7W sia stata accesa perennemente in una stanza, aumentando di qualche grado centigrado la temperatura media. Insomma, brutta roba a sentirsi. E negli ultimi 10-20 anni le cose sono andate peggio. E persino nei posti meno vulnerabili si sono verificati disastri di cui si sarebbe sentita molto volentieri la mancanza.
MV Wakashio oil spill
Location Offshore of Pointe d'Esny, south of Mauritius
Coordinates 20°26′17.23″S 57°44′40.67″ECoordinates: 20°26′17.23″S 57°44′40.67″E
Date 25 July 2020
Cause Grounding of MV Wakashio
Operator Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Spill characteristics
Volume1,000 metric tons
Area27 km2 (10 sq mi)
The MV Wakashio oil spill occurred offshore of Pointe d'Esny, south of Mauritius, after the Japanese bulk carrier Wakashio ran aground on a coral reef on 25 July 2020 at around 16:00 UTC.[1] The ship began to leak fuel oil in the following weeks, and broke apart in mid August. Although much of the oil on board Wakashio was pumped out before she broke in half, an estimated 1,000 tonnes of oil spilled into the ocean in what was called by some scientists the worst environmental disaster ever in Mauritius. Two weeks after the incident, the Mauritian government declared the incident a national emergency[2]
Background
MV Wakashio, a large capesize bulk carrier, was built by the Universal Shipbuilding Corporation of Tsu, Japan.[3] She was laid down on 23 September 2004, launched on 9 March 2007, and was delivered on 30 May 2007.[3] She had a deadweight tonnage of 203,000 tons, a length overall of 299.95 metres (984 ft 1 in), and a beam of 50 metres (164 ft 1 in).[3][4] She was powered by a single diesel engine that gave her a service speed of 14.5 knots (26.9 km/h).[3] The ship belonged to Okiyo Maritime Corp., an associate company of Nagashiki Shipping Co. Ltd.,[5] and was operated by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines.[6] At the time of her grounding, Wakashio was flying under a Panamanian flag of convenience, despite her Japanese ownership.[4] The ship was sailing without cargo,[7] and departed from Lianyungang, China on 4 July, stopped in Singapore, and was scheduled to reach Tubarão, Brazil on 13 August.[8] A crew of 20 was on board,[6] none of whom were injured.[5]
Japan's ClassNK inspection body said in a statement on 11 August that the ship had passed an annual inspection in March. Mitsui OSK said they doubted whether the incident would have a significant effect on their earnings.[9]
Incident
Wakashio ran aground on a coral reef on 25 July, but did not immediately begin leaking oil.[7] Oil began to leak from the ship on 6 August,[7] by which time Mauritius authorities were trying to control the spill and minimize its effects, isolating environmentally sensitive areas of the coast, while waiting for help from foreign countries to pump out an estimated 3,890 tons of oil remaining on board.[10] By 10 August, about 1,000 metric tons of fuel had spilled, with estimates of the remaining oil onboard ranging from 2,500 to 3,000 metric tons.[7][11] High winds and 5 metres (16 ft) waves halted cleanup efforts on 10 August; visible cracks in the hull of the ship led to worries that the ship might "break in two," according to Mauritius' prime minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth.[12] Jugnauth said that 3,000 tons of oil had been pumped out of the ship's fuel reservoirs. Data from Finnish Iceye satellites indicated the spill had increased from 3.3 km2 (1.3 sq mi) on 6 August to 27 km2 (10 sq mi) on 11 August.[13]
The ship broke up on 15 August when there were still 166 tons of fuel inside. Waves 4.5 metres (15 ft) high hindered cleanup.[14] After she split, Wakashio's bow section was towed into the open ocean and scuttled on 24 August.[15] Recovery operations continued around the stern section, which remained aground, and on 31 August a tugboat working on the wreck sank after colliding with a barge in heavy weather, killing at least three crewmembers.[16] In October, a salvage contract for the remaining stern section of Wakashio, still grounded on the reef, was awarded to Lianyungang Dali Underwater Engineering of China, which planned to begin deconstruction in December and continue for at least several months.[17]
According to investigators who conducted interviews with crew members, the crew had been celebrating the birthday of a sailor on board the ship at the time of the grounding, had sailed near shore for a wi-fi signal.[18] However, local police denied reports that the ship had sailed close to land seeking a Wi-Fi signal, saying that looking for a phone signal would not have required sailing so close to land.[19] Plus, the ship's vessel operator, Mitsui OSK Lines, that their fleet had access to free and unlimited internet access[20]. The ship then failed to respond to warnings of the errant course.[18][21] The ship's captain, a 58-year old Indian national named Sunil Kumar Nandeshwar, and deputy captain were arrested on 18 August on suspicion of negligence in operating the vessel.[22][23][19]
The grounding happened at an area which is listed under the Ramsar convention on wetlands of international importance and near the marine park of Blue Bay.[4][24] Tourism plays a major role in the economy of Mauritius, accounting for about 63 billion Mauritian rupees (US$1.59 billion) in spending in 2019, and is centered around marine scenery and animals likely to be endangered by the oil spill.[25] Greenpeace stated that "[t]housands of species [...] are at risk of drowning in a sea of pollution, with dire consequences for Mauritius’ economy, food security and health."[25]
Aftermath
Prime Minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth declared a "state of environmental emergency" and requested French help on 7 August.[26] "When biodiversity is in peril, there is urgency to act," French President Emmanuel Macron tweeted, "France is there. Alongside the people of Mauritius. You can count on our support dear Jugnauth."[27] France sent both military and civilian equipment and personnel from its overseas territory of Réunion.[25]
Local volunteers joined forces to remedy the situation by making cloth barriers stuffed with straw and human hair.[28] Japan sent a six-member crew of specialists to help in the cleanup.[12] On 11 August 2020, Indian Oil Mauritius Ltd (IOML) started to evacuate oil from the breached vessel onto the IOML barge Tresta Star, which had a capacity to hold 1,000 tonnes of oil.[29] India sent 30 tonnes of technical equipment and material to the country to help contain the oil spill as well as a 10-member team of the Indian Coast Guard specialising in containing oil spills.[30]
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development said the spill "risks bringing devastating consequences for the economy, food security, health and tourism industry."[31] The group also reminded countries about the importance of international legal instruments such as the HNS Convention for liability and compensation.[31]
Spilled oil was collected and loaded onto barges for handling in Port Louis.[32] On 31 August, a fatal accident occurred during a squall when the tug Sir Gaëtan Duval collided with its barge and subsequently sank; three of the eight-person crew were killed and one more was reported missing.[32][33]
By early November, all surface oil had been removed from Mauritius waters, and restoration of the coastline was expected to be completed by early 2021.[17]
Perceived failure of the government to respond promptly and effectively has resulted in protests.[34] In Mauritius, 150,000 protesters assembled in the capital Port Louis, focusing on the Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth, including calls for the prime minister to step down.[34] The Prime Minister has denied any responsibility.[35] International protests, primarily led by Mauritian diaspora, also occurred in Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland, France, Luxembourg, Germany, and the UK.[36]
The government has suspended the parliament, and has been accused of suppressing local media and preventing independent reporting regarding the incident, drawing sharp rebuke.[37] Additionally, the government has been criticised for delegating critical decision-making to faceless and unaccountable 'advisors'.[37]
Calls for shipping industry reform
The oil spill has, along with the 2020 Beirut explosion, brought into sharp contrast failures of the shipping industry, with critics highlighting lax attitude to operational safety.[37] Pope Francis called for increased environmental care to address and prevent such disasters in the future.[38] Shipping industry commentators and publications have also called for self-reflection by the stakeholders, including supporting the calls for increased shipping industry financial responsibility when it comes to disaster response and cleanup.[39]
Environmental damage
Oceanographer and environmental engineer Vassen Kauppaymuthoo said, "Around a little bit less than 50 percent of this lagoon is covered by environmentally sensitive areas, be it corals, be it seagrass, be it mangroves, be it entire mudflats, sand beaches and dunes, which is huge. Which confirms the sensitivity of this lagoon, in terms of oil spill." Ecotoxicologist Christopher Goodchild from Oklahoma State University said, "With this oil spill it looks like there is infiltration out of the mangroves, so you have the oily substance that can bind to organic matter or dirt and start to settle in and just being able to remove that toxic sediment can be a real challenge."[40] Flakes of the damaged anti-fouling coating on the hull can also poison the marine fauna and flora on the reef and surroundings in a similar fashion to what occurred on the Great Barrier Reef.[41]
Reuters quoted unnamed scientists as saying that the spill was likely the worst environmental incident in the history of Mauritius, with effects possibly lingering for decades.[14]
From 6 to 11 August, the spill expanded to over 26 square kilometres (10 sq mi).[42] The island's environment minister Kavy Ramano, together with the fisheries minister, told the press that it was the first time that the country faced a catastrophe of this magnitude, and that they were insufficiently equipped to handle the problem.[4]
Many dead sea mammals washed up on local beaches in the days following the spill,[38] and more have been found seriously ill.[34] Among the dead animals are dolphins[38][34][43] and melon-headed whales.[34]
Compensation and cleanup funding
Mauritius requested compensation for the spill from Wakashio owner Nagashiki Shipping, which according to the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage is responsible for oil damage. The ruling treaty for the circumstances of the incident is the 1976 Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, which prescribes a maximum payout of 2 billion Japanese yen in the original draft to which Mauritius is a signatory, and 7 billion yen according to a 1996 amendment signed by Japan. Wakashio is insured by the Japanese P&I Club for up to US$1 billion; the agency said it expected to pay at least some portion of the cost of the recovery effort.[44]
On 2 September 2020, Mauritius also asked Japan to pay $34 million in reparations for the disaster; the island nation demanded the money to "support local fishermen whose livelihoods were adversely impacted by an oil leak last month", according to a Mauritian government document.[45]
The ship's operator/charterer, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, pledged ¥1 billion (about US$9.4 million).[46] The Mauritius Natural Environment Recovery Fund will "fund environmental projects and support the local fishing community".[47] The president of MOL cited the payment as their "social responsibility" while apologizing for the damage.[47] MOL also expects that ship owner Nagashiki Shipping will contribute to the Fund.[47]
INSOMMA, una catastrofe incredibile e ignobile. Ricapitoliamo: il dannato cargo giapponese (per fortuna NON una petroliera) si avvicina troppo a Mauritius, pare per cercare un segnale wi-fi (così è stato riportato), e lo Schettino di turno lo manda a schiantarsi contro una delle isole più belle dell'Oceano Indiano. Già deprivata in passato di gran parte della sua fauna, cerca di trovare un faticoso equilibrio tra oltre un milione di abitanti e il turismo.
Era riuscita a scappare anche al COVIDDI (l'unica nazione senza casi attivi all'epoca, dell'intera zona 'africana'), ma poi non ha potuto fare niente contro questo mostro giapponese, più grosso di Godzilla, che ha distrutto la sua pacifica convivenza con il resto del mondo.
E il governo era chiaramente inadatto a gestire una catastrofe del genere. Ma chi ci ha fatto la peggior figura è il GIAPPONE, che proprio in questi periodi sta scappando via dal bando di pesca per le balene, e che ha mandato ben 6 (SEI!) specialisti per 'aiutare'. Io gli rimandavo indietro le teste mozzate degli specialisti, tanto per far capire che ne penso di tale abbondante aiuto! Ma come è possibile? Chi erano questi sei? Goku, Seya, Gundam, Mazinga, Jeeg Robot, Naruto?
Che paese del cazzo che è diventato il Giappone, fosse stata in pericolo una delle bimbette 'Idol' mandavano la flotta al completo.
Macron ci ha fatto indubbiamente una miglior figura. Ma adesso, chi paga per i danni e le vittime?
DATO CHE LA RACCOLTA DI INFORMAZIONI SI E' DILUNGATA TROPPO ANCHE PER I MIEI STANDARD, ho fatto uno speciale apposito su Mauritius, che è questo qua:
Speciale Mauritius - Dati utili per wargamers (weebly.com)
In quest'anno dovremmo essere riusciti ad abbattere un bel pò d'inquinamento perché, come dico sempre, dove non poté Greta poté Corona.
Ma disastri di ogni sorta non sono mancati, alcuni dei quali naturali (o quanto meno, non innescati direttamente dall'uomo), come le recenti alluvioni in: Calabria, Sardegna ed Emilia. Bella roba, per un tardo autunno, eh?
Ma i fenomeni estremi sono sempre più da aspettarsi: al TGR Leonardo l'altro giorno, dicevano che la temperatura di novembre è stata la più alta mai registrata come media globale. E che negli ultimi 50 anni è come se una lampadina da 7W sia stata accesa perennemente in una stanza, aumentando di qualche grado centigrado la temperatura media. Insomma, brutta roba a sentirsi. E negli ultimi 10-20 anni le cose sono andate peggio. E persino nei posti meno vulnerabili si sono verificati disastri di cui si sarebbe sentita molto volentieri la mancanza.
MV Wakashio oil spill
Location Offshore of Pointe d'Esny, south of Mauritius
Coordinates 20°26′17.23″S 57°44′40.67″ECoordinates: 20°26′17.23″S 57°44′40.67″E
Date 25 July 2020
Cause Grounding of MV Wakashio
Operator Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Spill characteristics
Volume1,000 metric tons
Area27 km2 (10 sq mi)
The MV Wakashio oil spill occurred offshore of Pointe d'Esny, south of Mauritius, after the Japanese bulk carrier Wakashio ran aground on a coral reef on 25 July 2020 at around 16:00 UTC.[1] The ship began to leak fuel oil in the following weeks, and broke apart in mid August. Although much of the oil on board Wakashio was pumped out before she broke in half, an estimated 1,000 tonnes of oil spilled into the ocean in what was called by some scientists the worst environmental disaster ever in Mauritius. Two weeks after the incident, the Mauritian government declared the incident a national emergency[2]
Background
MV Wakashio, a large capesize bulk carrier, was built by the Universal Shipbuilding Corporation of Tsu, Japan.[3] She was laid down on 23 September 2004, launched on 9 March 2007, and was delivered on 30 May 2007.[3] She had a deadweight tonnage of 203,000 tons, a length overall of 299.95 metres (984 ft 1 in), and a beam of 50 metres (164 ft 1 in).[3][4] She was powered by a single diesel engine that gave her a service speed of 14.5 knots (26.9 km/h).[3] The ship belonged to Okiyo Maritime Corp., an associate company of Nagashiki Shipping Co. Ltd.,[5] and was operated by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines.[6] At the time of her grounding, Wakashio was flying under a Panamanian flag of convenience, despite her Japanese ownership.[4] The ship was sailing without cargo,[7] and departed from Lianyungang, China on 4 July, stopped in Singapore, and was scheduled to reach Tubarão, Brazil on 13 August.[8] A crew of 20 was on board,[6] none of whom were injured.[5]
Japan's ClassNK inspection body said in a statement on 11 August that the ship had passed an annual inspection in March. Mitsui OSK said they doubted whether the incident would have a significant effect on their earnings.[9]
Incident
Wakashio ran aground on a coral reef on 25 July, but did not immediately begin leaking oil.[7] Oil began to leak from the ship on 6 August,[7] by which time Mauritius authorities were trying to control the spill and minimize its effects, isolating environmentally sensitive areas of the coast, while waiting for help from foreign countries to pump out an estimated 3,890 tons of oil remaining on board.[10] By 10 August, about 1,000 metric tons of fuel had spilled, with estimates of the remaining oil onboard ranging from 2,500 to 3,000 metric tons.[7][11] High winds and 5 metres (16 ft) waves halted cleanup efforts on 10 August; visible cracks in the hull of the ship led to worries that the ship might "break in two," according to Mauritius' prime minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth.[12] Jugnauth said that 3,000 tons of oil had been pumped out of the ship's fuel reservoirs. Data from Finnish Iceye satellites indicated the spill had increased from 3.3 km2 (1.3 sq mi) on 6 August to 27 km2 (10 sq mi) on 11 August.[13]
The ship broke up on 15 August when there were still 166 tons of fuel inside. Waves 4.5 metres (15 ft) high hindered cleanup.[14] After she split, Wakashio's bow section was towed into the open ocean and scuttled on 24 August.[15] Recovery operations continued around the stern section, which remained aground, and on 31 August a tugboat working on the wreck sank after colliding with a barge in heavy weather, killing at least three crewmembers.[16] In October, a salvage contract for the remaining stern section of Wakashio, still grounded on the reef, was awarded to Lianyungang Dali Underwater Engineering of China, which planned to begin deconstruction in December and continue for at least several months.[17]
According to investigators who conducted interviews with crew members, the crew had been celebrating the birthday of a sailor on board the ship at the time of the grounding, had sailed near shore for a wi-fi signal.[18] However, local police denied reports that the ship had sailed close to land seeking a Wi-Fi signal, saying that looking for a phone signal would not have required sailing so close to land.[19] Plus, the ship's vessel operator, Mitsui OSK Lines, that their fleet had access to free and unlimited internet access[20]. The ship then failed to respond to warnings of the errant course.[18][21] The ship's captain, a 58-year old Indian national named Sunil Kumar Nandeshwar, and deputy captain were arrested on 18 August on suspicion of negligence in operating the vessel.[22][23][19]
The grounding happened at an area which is listed under the Ramsar convention on wetlands of international importance and near the marine park of Blue Bay.[4][24] Tourism plays a major role in the economy of Mauritius, accounting for about 63 billion Mauritian rupees (US$1.59 billion) in spending in 2019, and is centered around marine scenery and animals likely to be endangered by the oil spill.[25] Greenpeace stated that "[t]housands of species [...] are at risk of drowning in a sea of pollution, with dire consequences for Mauritius’ economy, food security and health."[25]
Aftermath
Prime Minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth declared a "state of environmental emergency" and requested French help on 7 August.[26] "When biodiversity is in peril, there is urgency to act," French President Emmanuel Macron tweeted, "France is there. Alongside the people of Mauritius. You can count on our support dear Jugnauth."[27] France sent both military and civilian equipment and personnel from its overseas territory of Réunion.[25]
Local volunteers joined forces to remedy the situation by making cloth barriers stuffed with straw and human hair.[28] Japan sent a six-member crew of specialists to help in the cleanup.[12] On 11 August 2020, Indian Oil Mauritius Ltd (IOML) started to evacuate oil from the breached vessel onto the IOML barge Tresta Star, which had a capacity to hold 1,000 tonnes of oil.[29] India sent 30 tonnes of technical equipment and material to the country to help contain the oil spill as well as a 10-member team of the Indian Coast Guard specialising in containing oil spills.[30]
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development said the spill "risks bringing devastating consequences for the economy, food security, health and tourism industry."[31] The group also reminded countries about the importance of international legal instruments such as the HNS Convention for liability and compensation.[31]
Spilled oil was collected and loaded onto barges for handling in Port Louis.[32] On 31 August, a fatal accident occurred during a squall when the tug Sir Gaëtan Duval collided with its barge and subsequently sank; three of the eight-person crew were killed and one more was reported missing.[32][33]
By early November, all surface oil had been removed from Mauritius waters, and restoration of the coastline was expected to be completed by early 2021.[17]
Perceived failure of the government to respond promptly and effectively has resulted in protests.[34] In Mauritius, 150,000 protesters assembled in the capital Port Louis, focusing on the Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth, including calls for the prime minister to step down.[34] The Prime Minister has denied any responsibility.[35] International protests, primarily led by Mauritian diaspora, also occurred in Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland, France, Luxembourg, Germany, and the UK.[36]
The government has suspended the parliament, and has been accused of suppressing local media and preventing independent reporting regarding the incident, drawing sharp rebuke.[37] Additionally, the government has been criticised for delegating critical decision-making to faceless and unaccountable 'advisors'.[37]
Calls for shipping industry reform
The oil spill has, along with the 2020 Beirut explosion, brought into sharp contrast failures of the shipping industry, with critics highlighting lax attitude to operational safety.[37] Pope Francis called for increased environmental care to address and prevent such disasters in the future.[38] Shipping industry commentators and publications have also called for self-reflection by the stakeholders, including supporting the calls for increased shipping industry financial responsibility when it comes to disaster response and cleanup.[39]
Environmental damage
Oceanographer and environmental engineer Vassen Kauppaymuthoo said, "Around a little bit less than 50 percent of this lagoon is covered by environmentally sensitive areas, be it corals, be it seagrass, be it mangroves, be it entire mudflats, sand beaches and dunes, which is huge. Which confirms the sensitivity of this lagoon, in terms of oil spill." Ecotoxicologist Christopher Goodchild from Oklahoma State University said, "With this oil spill it looks like there is infiltration out of the mangroves, so you have the oily substance that can bind to organic matter or dirt and start to settle in and just being able to remove that toxic sediment can be a real challenge."[40] Flakes of the damaged anti-fouling coating on the hull can also poison the marine fauna and flora on the reef and surroundings in a similar fashion to what occurred on the Great Barrier Reef.[41]
Reuters quoted unnamed scientists as saying that the spill was likely the worst environmental incident in the history of Mauritius, with effects possibly lingering for decades.[14]
From 6 to 11 August, the spill expanded to over 26 square kilometres (10 sq mi).[42] The island's environment minister Kavy Ramano, together with the fisheries minister, told the press that it was the first time that the country faced a catastrophe of this magnitude, and that they were insufficiently equipped to handle the problem.[4]
Many dead sea mammals washed up on local beaches in the days following the spill,[38] and more have been found seriously ill.[34] Among the dead animals are dolphins[38][34][43] and melon-headed whales.[34]
Compensation and cleanup funding
Mauritius requested compensation for the spill from Wakashio owner Nagashiki Shipping, which according to the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage is responsible for oil damage. The ruling treaty for the circumstances of the incident is the 1976 Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, which prescribes a maximum payout of 2 billion Japanese yen in the original draft to which Mauritius is a signatory, and 7 billion yen according to a 1996 amendment signed by Japan. Wakashio is insured by the Japanese P&I Club for up to US$1 billion; the agency said it expected to pay at least some portion of the cost of the recovery effort.[44]
On 2 September 2020, Mauritius also asked Japan to pay $34 million in reparations for the disaster; the island nation demanded the money to "support local fishermen whose livelihoods were adversely impacted by an oil leak last month", according to a Mauritian government document.[45]
The ship's operator/charterer, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, pledged ¥1 billion (about US$9.4 million).[46] The Mauritius Natural Environment Recovery Fund will "fund environmental projects and support the local fishing community".[47] The president of MOL cited the payment as their "social responsibility" while apologizing for the damage.[47] MOL also expects that ship owner Nagashiki Shipping will contribute to the Fund.[47]
INSOMMA, una catastrofe incredibile e ignobile. Ricapitoliamo: il dannato cargo giapponese (per fortuna NON una petroliera) si avvicina troppo a Mauritius, pare per cercare un segnale wi-fi (così è stato riportato), e lo Schettino di turno lo manda a schiantarsi contro una delle isole più belle dell'Oceano Indiano. Già deprivata in passato di gran parte della sua fauna, cerca di trovare un faticoso equilibrio tra oltre un milione di abitanti e il turismo.
Era riuscita a scappare anche al COVIDDI (l'unica nazione senza casi attivi all'epoca, dell'intera zona 'africana'), ma poi non ha potuto fare niente contro questo mostro giapponese, più grosso di Godzilla, che ha distrutto la sua pacifica convivenza con il resto del mondo.
E il governo era chiaramente inadatto a gestire una catastrofe del genere. Ma chi ci ha fatto la peggior figura è il GIAPPONE, che proprio in questi periodi sta scappando via dal bando di pesca per le balene, e che ha mandato ben 6 (SEI!) specialisti per 'aiutare'. Io gli rimandavo indietro le teste mozzate degli specialisti, tanto per far capire che ne penso di tale abbondante aiuto! Ma come è possibile? Chi erano questi sei? Goku, Seya, Gundam, Mazinga, Jeeg Robot, Naruto?
Che paese del cazzo che è diventato il Giappone, fosse stata in pericolo una delle bimbette 'Idol' mandavano la flotta al completo.
Macron ci ha fatto indubbiamente una miglior figura. Ma adesso, chi paga per i danni e le vittime?
DATO CHE LA RACCOLTA DI INFORMAZIONI SI E' DILUNGATA TROPPO ANCHE PER I MIEI STANDARD, ho fatto uno speciale apposito su Mauritius, che è questo qua:
Speciale Mauritius - Dati utili per wargamers (weebly.com)